Technocrat Media, Lagos
The National Communications Commission (NCC) and The National Identity Management Commission (NIMC) has ignored the freedom of information (FOI) request made by Paradigm Initiative (PIN) and Ikigai Innovation Initiative (Ikigai Nation) asking to justify the access of security agencies to national identity and sim card databases of Nigerians.
In a press statement on Tuesday, the two civil society organizations said they sent a Freedom of Information request to the National Identity Management Commission (NIMC) and the Nigerian Communication Commission (NCC).
“In the letter dated 11th February 2022 the organisations queried the decision of the NIMC and NCC to grant certain security agencies in Nigeria, unfettered access to their databases. NCC and NIMC have statutory mandates to maintain the National identity and sim card database respectively. Although both organisations acknowledged receipt of the request on February 15, 2022, none of them is yet to respond to the questions asked.”
“PIN and Ikigai nation are demanding answers from the two government agencies on the basis of the statement credited to the Minister of Communications and Digital Economy, Dr. Pantami, that this is in line with the President’s approval granting some law enforcement agencies access to databases domiciled with the NIMC and NCC,” the statement reads.
While speaking on the development, Oyindamola Banjoko, Program Manager at Ikigai Nation said, “It is her organisation’s considered opinion that a presidential approval for unfettered access to these data is not founded under existing law. Although the government advances the argument of combating insecurity as a legitimate aim, the existing legal framework for surveillance in Nigeria lacks sufficient safeguards,” Banjoko concluded.
“The authorisation of the access granted to security agencies is questionable because it violates the provisions of various human rights laws, by giving law enforcement agencies excessive discretion and failing to provide checks and balances to prevent governmental excesses,” says Adeboye Adegoke, Senior Program Manager at Paradigm Initiative.
The two organizations demands include what legal provisions were relied on to give such access to security agencies? What human rights safeguards exist to monitor the access to databases by law enforcement agents? What independent oversight mechanisms exist to check accountability and transparency of the activities of law enforcement agents?
Also, they added “what are the legal and institutional safeguards in place to ensure accountability on the part of the security agencies who have been given access?
According to the provisions of the Freedom of Information Act 2011, a public institution is obliged to respond to such a request within 7 working days of receiving it.
On the next steps for the organisations, Banjoko hinted that the organisation may be compelled to explore judicial options to compel the two agencies to provide the information they sought.
